All Hail Lubna 'whip me if you dare' Hussein

Hello,

I'm not one of these proud to be a woman types. Not because there's anything wrong with being female but it's not something I had an awful lot to do with. To be proud of it would be like being proud of having big feet, it's just how I was born. I'm happy enough with that, although key moments of my life have been ruined for lack of a penis. Ideally I'd like to be able to switch genders at will but nature is not known for her generosity on the gender front. That said every so often a woman does something so heroic, courageous and downright brilliant that one does get the urge to strut around saying 'that's one of my lot' and basking in a bit of reflected glory. What can I say I'm a awful glory seeker.



I am referring to the brave and defiant Ms Lubna Hussein who has been sentenced to forty lashes by the savages that run Sudan for wearing trousers. What makes this woman so remarkable and sets her apart from most of the rest of us is that as an employee of the UN she was offered immunity by the Sundanese authorities. Instead of grabbing this opportunity with both hands she resigned from the UN in order to take the punishment and use her case to highlight the despicable behaviour of these sexually inadequate brutes.



Funnily enough these upstanding moral guardians are notoriously dishonest and regularly demand sexual favours from the women they arrest. You might feel a sliver of pity for these repellent chaps for being unable to get laid without using force but I'm inclined to repress that and send that portion of the pity ration to someone more deserving like Donald Trump. At least the thieving, lying, raping morality police get to feel good about themselves. In contrast Trump must sob himself to sleep thinking about that hair.





Whilst I would indulge in a cheeky lady chuckle if the world's women formed an army, invaded Sudan and strung every last member of their government up, the prospect is quite unlikely. Instead I have sent a letter, well more a miracle of restraint of to the Sudanese Embassy asking if they wouldn't mind giving the lashes a miss. Obviously what I wanted to write was 'would you wretched pigs do the world a favour and kill yourselves' but it's not terribly persuasive is it? The small penis jibes and wicked curses also hit the cutting room floor as did the threats to set fire to the ambassadors testicles and steal his Ferrero Rocher. Still it's hard to appeal to the better side of people who are so uniformly fucking awful, so it was a very short letter.



If anyone else is as eye poppingly angry about this as I am please write a polite letter to the Sudanese Embassy at 3 Cleveland Row, London, SW1A 1DD. For the sort of people who turn up on Reporting Scotland vox pops if you could put about one hundredth of the energy into supporting Ms Hussein as you do into worrying just how vast your arse looks in trousers and get an adult to help you with a letter to the Sudanese Embassy you might be able to point to at least one useful thing you've done in your pointless bovine life. There is also a petition to sign here.



Cheerio

Steady On Lass!

Hello,
As I've mentioned once or twice before embittered, old drunk Tanya Gold rips my knitting something awful. However this time she has managed to completely astonish me with her outburst of psychotic snobbery at beauty contests of all things.

I must confess I can't really get terribly worked up about them, I don't think they tell us much about women generally or even women who enter beauty contests. I just wish the contestants were a bit more honest and instead of wittering on about world peace would just fess up that they want to win so they can fuck the entire premier league. In fact anyone who gave an answer like that should win no matter what they look like.

Anyway I can only imagine Tanya has been reading the works of the Marquis de Sade and possibly Nuts. How else do you explain her desire to 'to strip them of their degrees - and their over-moisturised heads - and use them as battering rams. Or tampons. (I hereby patent the idea of using beauty queens with degrees as tampons'? That was after she described the contests themselves as 'slagfests'. Good Lord! I thought it was the dreaded 'male gaze' we were all meant to flee in terror from but the 'Gold gaze' is only slightly less sinister than waking up to find Peter Sutcliffe peering in your window.

Worst of all for me was her sneering at the contestants poor spelling -a consequence of the poor education they received which she utterly fails to realise means that entering beauty contests is one of the few means they have of making anything resembling decent money. Sorry I just find something rather distasteful about a spoiled, stuck up, whiny, self pitying little fuck pig sneering at disadvantaged folk making the best of a bad lot. Perhaps that's what really gets her goat. If the women she wants to behead had been born with her advantages and opportunities they'd be doing ten times better in life than her whereas if she's been born where they were she wouldn't even have beauty contests as an escape route. The more usual feminist view of women in beauty contests as victims is not one I share but it is, all things considered preferable to behead the slags.

I wouldn't mind but she's the first to whine if you 'speak viciously' about one of her cronies at The Guardian. Rude as I am about Bindel I have never wanted to shove her up my fanny. Not even once for a laugh. Still I wouldn't like to be in Tanya's shoes when Stephanie Crabtree finds out what she's been saying.


Cheerio

Misogyny at The Guardian

Hello,

'Look

You create a society where material wealth is the number one motivation sold to the population.

You drive into this population that "success" is to own a playstation3 or a VW golf or a nice chick (for which you will need HUGE amounts of cash money!)

The MSM and peer pressure constantly pushes the vision of a wonderful lifestyle full of consumer goods and beautiful people, enjoying a great life, full of trendy friends and lovely homes with loving families.

For some, this reflects real life and is achievable.'

But for many this dream world is NOT achievable.

Now this system expects those excluded from the party to accept their lot and keep quite.

HA!

This disparity between the haves and the have nots is the problem. Even with most "senseless" violent crime, the root cause is the anger of the injustice of this system.

If you are serious about cutting crime, END INEQUALITY and put an end to the massive gap between the rich and the poor.

An explanation for crime from The Guardian website- Am I alone in being worried that even liberals think women are property? I expect that's why women can be let off with murder if it was preceded by domestic violence after all it's no worse morally than a washing machine going on the blink. I'm also relieved to hear that domestic violence isn't as serious as we'd all been led to believe, after all the bitch is a man's property-it's no worse than doing a Basil Fawlty on an unreliable car. The way people go on you'd have thought it was human beings taking a kicking rather than mere consumer trinkets with tits . Did feminism actually happen or am I dreaming?

Cheerio

Some men hate all women all the time.........

Hello,
It's fair to say that Felicity J Lowde and I will never be chums. I think she's mental, she thinks she isn't. Instead she reckons I'm mental and I'm fucked if I'm going to concede points to the enemy. Quite apart from anything else -urinals? I did pee in one a while back but that was an emergency and I got a round of applause from the chaps but other than that I'm indifferent to them.


Anyway she's out and about after a stint in the slammer with an appeal against her conviction coming up. At any rate she is at the present time an ex-prisoner. So I was somewhat shocked to see these comments on her blog from an ex-prisoner turned prisoners rights campaigner on her blog.

'Glad to hear that you are homeless. I am sure that men will give you a bed for the night in return for your sexual favours.'

'So, not only have you lost your head you have lost your house. LOL.'

That a prominent, self- identified supporter of Rachel North would leave such nasty, provocative and unpleasant comments on her stalker's blog beggars belief. For God's sake is he trying to take Rachel's mind off her mothers death by getting her stalked again? Or does he just enjoy a bit of cyber mud-wrestling? After all it is only women we're talking about. Not proper humans with dicks.

I'm also surprised that a campaigner for prisoners rights would take any pleasure in seeing an ex-con homeless. One would have thought the least someone returning to straight and narrow path would need is somewhere to live and enough to keep them from starvation. After all an unstable lifestyle is hardly a recipe for a productive, socially acceptable future. Or is it just rights for misogynist murderers convicted of manslaughter he's into?

Also slightly odd is his apparent glee at someone with obvious mental problems having gone through the system coming out the other side no better. Surely her plight demonstrates what an appalling waste of time jailing the mentally ill is. If there were better services for the mentally ill in the community a good deal of crime could be avoided.

I cannot work out whether his comments come from a general hatred of women, quite likely given his past history and the apparent inability, demonstrated in his first comment, to regard an impoverished woman as good for more than fucking.

Something tells me someone is more about self- promotion than defending the marginalised or are prisoners rights for men only? With his constant boasting about hits and his inability to see he's little more than a liberal freakshow I think I know the answer to that one.

Cheerio