It's fair to say that Felicity J Lowde and I will never be chums. I think she's mental, she thinks she isn't. Instead she reckons I'm mental and I'm fucked if I'm going to concede points to the enemy. Quite apart from anything else -urinals? I did pee in one a while back but that was an emergency and I got a round of applause from the chaps but other than that I'm indifferent to them.
Anyway she's out and about after a stint in the slammer with an appeal against her conviction coming up. At any rate she is at the present time an ex-prisoner. So I was somewhat shocked to see these comments on her blog from an ex-prisoner turned prisoners rights campaigner on her blog.
'Glad to hear that you are homeless. I am sure that men will give you a bed for the night in return for your sexual favours.'
'So, not only have you lost your head you have lost your house. LOL.'
That a prominent, self- identified supporter of Rachel North would leave such nasty, provocative and unpleasant comments on her stalker's blog beggars belief. For God's sake is he trying to take Rachel's mind off her mothers death by getting her stalked again? Or does he just enjoy a bit of cyber mud-wrestling? After all it is only women we're talking about. Not proper humans with dicks.
I'm also surprised that a campaigner for prisoners rights would take any pleasure in seeing an ex-con homeless. One would have thought the least someone returning to straight and narrow path would need is somewhere to live and enough to keep them from starvation. After all an unstable lifestyle is hardly a recipe for a productive, socially acceptable future. Or is it just rights for misogynist murderers convicted of manslaughter he's into?
Also slightly odd is his apparent glee at someone with obvious mental problems having gone through the system coming out the other side no better. Surely her plight demonstrates what an appalling waste of time jailing the mentally ill is. If there were better services for the mentally ill in the community a good deal of crime could be avoided.
I cannot work out whether his comments come from a general hatred of women, quite likely given his past history and the apparent inability, demonstrated in his first comment, to regard an impoverished woman as good for more than fucking.
Something tells me someone is more about self- promotion than defending the marginalised or are prisoners rights for men only? With his constant boasting about hits and his inability to see he's little more than a liberal freakshow I think I know the answer to that one.